Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32

Jason Kuehl jason.w.kuehl at gmail.com
Fri Dec 8 20:00:40 CST 2017


+1 for gross comment.

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog at uah.edu> wrote:

> I think I'd rate this one as "gross but technically not breaking any rules
> I suppose." (I couldn't find any at first glance, anyway.)
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:55 PM Ryan Hamel <Ryan.Hamel at quadranet.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > A colleague of mine has static routed 172.16.0.0/32 to a usable IP
> > address, to have a single known IP address be static routed to a regions
> > closest server. While I understand the IP address does work (pings and
> what
> > not), I don't feel this should be the proper IP address used, but
> something
> > more feasible like a usable IP in a dedicated range (172.31.0.0/24 for
> > example).
> >
> > I would to hear everyone's thoughts on this, as this the first IP address
> > in an RFC1918 range.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Hamel
> > ryan.hamel at quadranet.com | +1 (888) 578-2372 <(888)%20578-2372>
> > QuadraNet, Inc. | Dedicated Servers, Colocation, Cloud
> >
> > --
>
> --
> Hunter Fuller
> Network Engineer
> VBH Annex B-5
> +1 256 824 5331
>
> Office of Information Technology
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
> Systems and Infrastructure
>



-- 
Sincerely,

Jason W Kuehl
Cell 920-419-8983
jason.w.kuehl at gmail.com


More information about the NANOG mailing list