Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
mike.lyon at gmail.com
mike.lyon at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 18:35:48 UTC 2017
What hardware you running the CHR on?
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:29, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
>
> I'm replacing an M10i with a CHR.
>
> I hope you have a newer RE so that you don't have worse BGP convergence than a CCR.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "mike lyon" <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
> To: tony at wicks.co.nz
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:11:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
>
> Unfortunately, yes. Thats why two Juniper M7is just arrived on my doorstep yesterday...
>
>> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:10, <tony at wicks.co.nz> <tony at wicks.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>> Is that actually still true nowadays ? Of course there is always the option of running RouterOS on an X86 for an effective solution as well.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mike.lyon at gmail.com [mailto:mike.lyon at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 7:07 AM
>> To: tony at wicks.co.nz
>> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
>>
>> Bad thing about the CCRs is that their BGP process is single threaded. So even though it has a bunch of cores, it doesn’t utilize them for BGP.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list