Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption

Mike Hammett nanog at ics-il.net
Tue Dec 5 18:28:36 CST 2017


I understand that most BGP implementations are single-threaded. 

The problem is that it sucks, which version 7 fixes... whenever the unicorn makes that delivery. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "mike lyon" <mike.lyon at gmail.com> 
To: tony at wicks.co.nz 
Cc: nanog at nanog.org 
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:07:19 PM 
Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption 

Bad thing about the CCRs is that their BGP process is single threaded. So even though it has a bunch of cores, it doesn’t utilize them for BGP. 

-Mike 

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 09:50, <tony at wicks.co.nz> <tony at wicks.co.nz> wrote: 
> 
> For me the obvious answer for the OP is the Mikrotik CCR range - https://mikrotik.com/product/CCR1036-8G-2Splus 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke 
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 6:00 AM 
> To: nanog at nanog.org list <nanog at nanog.org> 
> Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption 
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list