Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
Mike Hammett
nanog at ics-il.net
Tue Dec 5 18:28:36 UTC 2017
I understand that most BGP implementations are single-threaded.
The problem is that it sucks, which version 7 fixes... whenever the unicorn makes that delivery.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike lyon" <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
To: tony at wicks.co.nz
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:07:19 PM
Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
Bad thing about the CCRs is that their BGP process is single threaded. So even though it has a bunch of cores, it doesn’t utilize them for BGP.
-Mike
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 09:50, <tony at wicks.co.nz> <tony at wicks.co.nz> wrote:
>
> For me the obvious answer for the OP is the Mikrotik CCR range - https://mikrotik.com/product/CCR1036-8G-2Splus
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 6:00 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org list <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list