ccTLDs - Become a Registrar
Jacques.Latour at cira.ca
Fri Dec 1 19:51:07 CST 2017
That's why we're working on DNSSEC automation, to let the DNS Operator sign the zone and automate the provisioning of DS record into the registry without registrant or registrar intervention. Multiple methods and approach being work on.
API for DNS Operator: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-04
Registry full zone polling: https://en.blog.nic.cz/2017/06/21/lets-make-dns-great-again/
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: December 1, 2017 2:36 PM
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: ccTLDs - Become a Registrar
http://rick.eng.br/dnssecstat/ is more on topic of we what discussing,
although the monitor is interesting too.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Christopher Morrow <
> morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> .br also has such requirements. OpenSRS reference chart has a good hint
>>> which ccTLDs have such requirements:
>> wow, 256 of 539 report "no" for DNSSEC.
> For DNSSEC this one is more reliable:
More information about the NANOG