Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?
jk at ip-clear.de
Thu Aug 31 10:50:58 UTC 2017
but isn't peer A prefix-out a synonym for peer B prefix-in, that will
lead to the same result, e.g. a BGP teardown?
I just feel that this will add another factor, that people will not use
or abuse: neigh $x max-out infinite
What about adding an option to the BGP session that A & B do agree on a
fixed number of prefixes in both directions, so Bs prefix-in could be As
On 31 Aug 2017, at 7:01, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> What a terrific idea..., simple & useful
> El 29/8/17 a las 1:41 p.m., Michael Still escribió:
>> I agree a max-prefix outbound could potentially be useful and would
>> hopefully not be too terribly difficult to implement for most
>> Perhaps RFC4486 would need to be updated to reflect this as a
>> possibility as well?
More information about the NANOG