BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
ahebert at pubnix.net
Wed Sep 28 11:05:57 UTC 2016
Do not forget the "NRA" ways.
Circular discussions every time an event arise, let it die out after
a few days, and hopefully, nothing change.
Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 09/27/16 14:16, Joe Klein wrote:
> The knobs that are available to push adoption of any standard can include
> "Doing nothing", "Educating the community", "Incentives", "Public
> Shaming", "Loss of business", "Engaging the policy & legal wanks". It seems
> to me the first two options have not moved the ball much.
> Must we move the last four to fix the DDOS problem? The last one scares me,
> but the other three might be valid method to move the ball.
> Joe Klein
> "Inveniam viam aut faciam"
> PGP Fingerprint: 295E 2691 F377 C87D 2841 00C1 4174 FEDF 8ECF 0CC8
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Joe Klein wrote:
>> What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
>> Well, you can get people to run https://www.caida.org/projects
>> I tried to get OpenWrt to include similar software, on by default, but
>> some people are afraid that they might incur legal action on themselves by
>> doing antispoofing-testing.
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/anti-spoofing might be of
>> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG