BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
Wed Sep 28 11:05:57 UTC 2016


    Do not forget the "NRA" ways.

    Circular discussions every time an event arise, let it die out after
a few days, and hopefully, nothing change.

Alain Hebert                                ahebert at pubnix.net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 09/27/16 14:16, Joe Klein wrote:
> The knobs that are available to push adoption of any standard can include
> "Doing nothing", "Educating the community",  "Incentives", "Public
> Shaming", "Loss of business", "Engaging the policy & legal wanks". It seems
> to me the first two options have not moved the ball much.
> Must we move the last four to fix the DDOS problem? The last one scares me,
> but the other three might be valid method to move the ball.
> Joe Klein
> "Inveniam viam aut faciam"
> PGP Fingerprint: 295E 2691 F377 C87D 2841 00C1 4174 FEDF 8ECF 0CC8
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Joe Klein wrote:
>> What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
>> Well, you can get people to run https://www.caida.org/projects
>> /spoofer/#software
>> I tried to get OpenWrt to include similar software, on by default, but
>> some people are afraid that they might incur legal action on themselves by
>> doing antispoofing-testing.
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/anti-spoofing might be of
>> interest.
>> --
>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

More information about the NANOG mailing list