BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

Tue Sep 27 18:16:23 UTC 2016

The knobs that are available to push adoption of any standard can include
"Doing nothing", "Educating the community",  "Incentives", "Public
Shaming", "Loss of business", "Engaging the policy & legal wanks". It seems
to me the first two options have not moved the ball much.

Must we move the last four to fix the DDOS problem? The last one scares me,
but the other three might be valid method to move the ball.

Joe Klein
"Inveniam viam aut faciam"

PGP Fingerprint: 295E 2691 F377 C87D 2841 00C1 4174 FEDF 8ECF 0CC8

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Joe Klein wrote:
>
> What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
>>
>
> Well, you can get people to run https://www.caida.org/projects
> /spoofer/#software
>
> I tried to get OpenWrt to include similar software, on by default, but
> some people are afraid that they might incur legal action on themselves by
> doing antispoofing-testing.
>
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/anti-spoofing might be of
> interest.
>
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
>