Request for comment -- BCP38

Hugo Slabbert hugo at slabnet.com
Mon Sep 26 16:44:06 UTC 2016


On Mon 2016-Sep-26 12:39:21 -0400, John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

>>If we're talking about networks with that kind of MRC, is it really 
>>that far of a stretch to require PI space for this?  Then again:  
>>If we're talking about that kind of MRC, then I'm assuming ISP A 
>>can be coaxed to allow explicit and well-defined exceptions on the 
>>customer's links.
>
>Yes.
>
>A) Check the prices for PI space, if you can even get any.
>
>B) Our network works fine with PA space.  If you claim otherwise, we 
>know plenty of other operators who aren't as wedged as you are.
>
>Trying to solve technical problems with social solutions rarely 
>works. See for example, the sad history of passwords.

Mike and Aled covering this better than I am.

>
>Regards,
>John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
>Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160926/c9024967/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list