Request for comment -- BCP38
Hugo Slabbert
hugo at slabnet.com
Mon Sep 26 16:44:06 UTC 2016
On Mon 2016-Sep-26 12:39:21 -0400, John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>>If we're talking about networks with that kind of MRC, is it really
>>that far of a stretch to require PI space for this? Then again:
>>If we're talking about that kind of MRC, then I'm assuming ISP A
>>can be coaxed to allow explicit and well-defined exceptions on the
>>customer's links.
>
>Yes.
>
>A) Check the prices for PI space, if you can even get any.
>
>B) Our network works fine with PA space. If you claim otherwise, we
>know plenty of other operators who aren't as wedged as you are.
>
>Trying to solve technical problems with social solutions rarely
>works. See for example, the sad history of passwords.
Mike and Aled covering this better than I am.
>
>Regards,
>John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
>Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160926/c9024967/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list