"Defensive" BGP hijacking?

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 20:59:14 UTC 2016


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Bryan Fields <Bryan at bryanfields.net> wrote:

> On 9/14/16 3:09 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> >
> > Yes, RPKI.  That's what I was waiting for.  Now we can get to
> > a real discussion
>
> Problem is, RPKI does not work for people with legacy blocks who will not
> sign
> a Legacy RSA.  ARIN doesn't own or have any say on how we use it, and we're
>

sure it does, move your registration to ripe.
<http://www.iepg.org/2016-04-03-ietf95/160403.iepg-transfer.pdf>

(this was also given at nanog or ripe or something, I couldn't remember
which was the right one)



> sure as heck not going to sign a legally binding contract saying they do :)
>
>
don't have to... see preso.


> I'm a bit ambivalent about BGP hijacking as a DDOS mitigation strategy.
> Really there is no authority to say it's wrong.  If your peers are cool
> with
> it, and their peers are cool with it who's to say it's wrong?
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
>
> 727-409-1194 - Voice
> http://bryanfields.net
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list