"Defensive" BGP hijacking?

Hugo Slabbert hugo at slabnet.com
Tue Sep 13 20:36:19 UTC 2016

On Tue 2016-Sep-13 13:32:56 -0700, Scott Weeks <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:

>--- bryant at backconnect.com wrote:
>From: Bryant Townsend <bryant at backconnect.com>
>@ca & Matt - No, we do not plan to ever intentionally perform a
>non-authorized BGP hijack in the future.
>Who was the upstream provider?



Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160913/51f7f2ff/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list