Public DNS64

Hugo Slabbert hugo at slabnet.com
Mon May 30 15:18:53 UTC 2016


On Mon 2016-May-30 11:45:11 +1000, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

>
>In message <CAPkb-7Dcfwzy2amNXJS0jQKm1S36N8c5p=SpjMbeWFRt4OOphw at mail.gmail.com>
>, Baldur Norddahl writes:
>> Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would
>> be unstable.
>
>This is not anycast NAT64.  It is anycast DNS64 with the well known
>64:ff9b::/96 prefix and a local NAT64 box.
>
>While I don't like DNS64 as a solution, this service doesn't need
>to be critised for faults that don't exist with it.

Pretty sure this was in response to:

>> > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
>> > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.

...so specifically regarding the idea of a public, anycast NAT64 service, 
rather than the public DNS64 service Google is doing.

>
>Mark

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal

>
>> Sorry time to get to sleep.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Baldur
>> Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>:
>>
>> > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
>> > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
>> > Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> For the record:
>> >>
>> >> Tim,
>> >>
>> >> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this
>> >> thread:
>> >>
>> >>     https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
>> >>
>> >> but I figured I'd let you know that:
>> >>
>> >>     https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
>> >>
>> >> is now available for testing.  Perhaps it will be some use.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> -Erik
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
>> >> >
>> >> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
>> >> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
>> >> >
>> >> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Tim:>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Tim:>
>> >>
>> >
>-- 
>Mark Andrews, ISC
>1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160530/7eaff54d/attachment.pgp>


More information about the NANOG mailing list