Public DNS64

Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Mon May 30 01:39:50 UTC 2016


DNS64 is a bad solution.  It breaks DNSSEC.  The proported benefits of
DNS64 over other ways of providing IPv4 over IPv6 don't actually exist.

DS-Lite or one of the MAP encapsulation will actually be better in the
long run.

I say this as someone who has written a DNS64 implementation.

Mark

In message <CAE_ug16_y+Ww8B3vkh-V4RNgGJyGcT9GH65z7uYpf_-XuR_ReA at mail.gmail.com>
, Tim Durack writes:
> For the record:
> 
> Tim,
> 
> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this thread:
> 
>     https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
> 
> but I figured I'd let you know that:
> 
>     https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
> 
> is now available for testing.  Perhaps it will be some use.
> 
> Regards,
> -Erik
> 
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
> >
> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
> >
> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
> >
> > --
> > Tim:>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tim:>
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org


More information about the NANOG mailing list