MPLS Reference Designs

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at
Fri May 27 21:52:05 UTC 2016

On 27/May/16 20:36, Alain Hebert wrote:

>     ( Obviously interoperability is just ridiculous when talking MPLS... )

Why would you think so?

>     Too many times we ended up finding boxes that look the part but are
> limited in such a way to accomplish only the task that fit the vendor
> own MPLS paradigm.
>     ( TLDR: Make us spend more $$$ than needed =D long gone is the
> swiss-knife concept )

What platforms have you worked on before that have caused you grief?


More information about the NANOG mailing list