MPLS Reference Designs
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Fri May 27 21:52:05 UTC 2016
On 27/May/16 20:36, Alain Hebert wrote:
> ( Obviously interoperability is just ridiculous when talking MPLS... )
Why would you think so?
> Too many times we ended up finding boxes that look the part but are
> limited in such a way to accomplish only the task that fit the vendor
> own MPLS paradigm.
> ( TLDR: Make us spend more $$$ than needed =D long gone is the
> swiss-knife concept )
What platforms have you worked on before that have caused you grief?
More information about the NANOG