Standards for last mile performance
josh at kyneticwifi.com
Sun May 1 15:02:01 UTC 2016
Disagreeing is okay. It wouldn't make you any less wrong though :P
On May 1, 2016 3:58 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> > No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
> > cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also
> > end up using far, far less fiber strands.
> I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on
> Lord knows I've been having it since 2008.
More information about the NANOG