Standards for last mile performance

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun May 1 08:58:24 UTC 2016


On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:

> No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
> cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also
> end up using far, far less fiber strands.
>

I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on
forever...

Lord knows I've been having it since 2008.

Mark.


More information about the NANOG mailing list