Standards for last mile performance

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun May 1 08:46:36 UTC 2016


On 30/Apr/16 20:36, Josh Reynolds wrote:

> For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller
> splits.. 1x16. Some are doing 1x2's or 1x4's at the corner somewhere into
> 1x16's or 1x8's, so at the point where you start to hit decent saturation
> you can just shrink the upstream split and fuse onto a new upstream strand
> / optic. Once that gets overused, thankfully you can overlay NG-PON2.

If you're being this aggressive, and then having to re-invest in the
next PON standard, isn't the case for Active-E being made more and more?

Mark.


More information about the NANOG mailing list