Juniper MX Sizing

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at
Tue Mar 15 06:01:15 UTC 2016

On 14/Mar/16 14:35, Colton Conor wrote:

> Mark,
> You are right that makes sense. So as a recap, you were seeing about
> 45 seconds route convergence time using RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM. For a
> MX104 it took 4min 25sec. I assume a MX80 would be even slower than an
> MX104.
> What about a MX480 with RE-2000's with 4GB of ram? Does anyone have
> any stats on that? I would assume faster than a MX104 but slower than
> the RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM.

I don't have empirical data, but yes, the MX80 and MX104 will be way
slower across the board.


More information about the NANOG mailing list