Cogent - Google - HE Fun

Sun Mar 13 17:54:08 UTC 2016

On 3/13/16 7:31 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
> In the end, google has made a choice. I think these kinds of choices will delay IPv6 adoption.  

Given that they publish AAAA records for a great deal of their services
I'm not sure how you would conclude that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damien Burke [mailto:damien at supremebytes.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:51 PM
> To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>; Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>; Dennis Burgess <dmburgess at linktechs.net>
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: RE: Cogent - Google - HE Fun
> 
> Just received an updated statement from cogent support:
> 
> "We appreciate your concerns. This is a known issue that originates with Google as it is up to their discretion as to how they announce routes to us v4 or v6. 
> 
> Once again, apologies for any inconvenience."
> 
> And:
> 
> "The SLA does not cover route transit beyond our network. We cannot route to IPs that are not announced to us by the IP owner, directly or through a network peer."
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160313/620610ad/attachment.sig>