IPV6 planning

Saku Ytti saku at ytti.fi
Sat Mar 5 23:57:54 UTC 2016

On 6 March 2016 at 00:59, Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au> wrote:
> Other thing with SLAAC is that you get 64-bit subnets and only 64-bit
> subnets. This should not be any kind of problem with a flat /48, but if
> you will have more complicated subnetting you should keep an eye on it.

Technically speaking there is no reason not to support SLAAC on
arbitrary size networks. I believe Cisco happily will autogenerate
address for smaller subnets.


More information about the NANOG mailing list