Netflix banning HE tunnels
Karl Auer
kauer at biplane.com.au
Fri Jun 10 04:20:53 UTC 2016
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 20:57 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > zero interoperability, and no viable migration paths, it's a
> > > Forklift
> > > Upgrade(tm).
> >
> > You say that with such confidence! Doesn't make it true.
>
> https://archive.psg.com/120206.nanog-v4-life-extension.pdf
Zero interoperability is technically true. However the two protocols
can live very happily side by side, NOT interfering with each other.
Ricky saying "zero interoperability" is technically true - but not
really relevant.
As to "no viable upgrade paths" you seem to be a good example of NOT
that. Did you replace all your equipment in one great and costly spasm
to achieve IPv6 delivery to customers?
Getting IPv6 up and running is not a simple thing, but nor is it
leaking-blood-from-the ears territory.
"It's a forklift upgrade! There are no viable upgrade paths! Zero
interoperability!" - this is just Chicken Little stuff.
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389
GPG fingerprint: E00D 64ED 9C6A 8605 21E0 0ED0 EE64 2BEE CBCB C38B
Old fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4
More information about the NANOG
mailing list