packet loss question

Sean Donelan sean at donelan.com
Tue Jul 12 07:25:06 UTC 2016


On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, cpolish at surewest.net wrote:
> Thanks for identifying the source, I wish more people did this.
> My nitpick is that RFC791 doesn't label MTU=68 as "standard";
> it says (section 3.2, p.25):

RFC791 was written during the internet's anti-standard era.

We reject: kings, presidents and voting. We believe in: rough consensus 
and running code





More information about the NANOG mailing list