GPON vs. GEPON

Mike Hammett nanog at ics-il.net
Fri Jan 8 18:53:16 UTC 2016


I think that was Josh's point, that 5 GHz will likely deliver better RF performance than 2.4 (despite physics) due to the amount of interference in 2.4. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> 
To: "Josh Reynolds" <josh at kyneticwifi.com> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>, nanog-isp at mail.com 
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 12:46:37 PM 
Subject: Re: GPON vs. GEPON 

> Count in oversubscription rates for residential, and consider that most 
> people, despite what they say or think, will end up on 2.4GHz wireless in 
> the home due to 5GHz sucking more than a room away - that ends up being a 
> very scalable solution for residential service. 

Um… 5GHz works a lot better from one end of my house to the other than 2.4Ghz 
due (in large part) to this fact… Almost every one of my neighbors is using 
various 2.4GHz devices including about 45 external SSIDs visible from the 
center of my house using the on-board antenna of an ESP8266 board from Adafruit. 

The noise floor and congestion on 2.4GHz in many urban settings, especially here 
in Silicon Valley makes 5Ghz a much better option in any home where people are 
smart enough to pay attention to the difference. 

OTOH, since the WiFi consortium took away the ability for consumers to easily 
differentiate (it’s all “n” or “ac” now regardless of frequency) and you have 
to really read the fine print on the side of the box to find a 5Ghz capable 
WAP at your local big box store, most consumers end up on 2.4Ghz because those 
are the least expensive routers on the shelf. 

Personally, I don’t mind this, but I think the 2.4Ghz prevalence has more to do 
with consumers not knowing what they are buying than it does with performance. 

Owen 





More information about the NANOG mailing list