Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
toddunder at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 17:29:15 UTC 2016
let me try to be more concrete and helpful:
lots of people who work at google *and* at cogent are on this list.
none of them are doing anything to look at anything right now b/c
there are no facts in evidence yet.
if you want help with something or want to verify something, provide a
time, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deleskie at gmail.com> wrote:
> They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :)
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
>> Todd Underwood wrote:
>> > Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data?
>> are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list?
>> > T
>> > On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred at web2objects.com> wrote:
>> >> Anyone else aware of it?
More information about the NANOG