PCH Peering Paper
niels=nanog at bakker.net
Sat Feb 13 01:56:14 UTC 2016
* bedard.phil at gmail.com (Phil Bedard) [Sat 13 Feb 2016, 01:40 CET]:
>I was going to ask the same thing, since even for settlement free
>peering between large content providers and eyeball networks there
>are written agreements in place. I would have no clue on the volume
>percentage but it's not going to be near 99%.
It's much closer to 99% than to 50%, though.
More information about the NANOG