PCH Peering Paper
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Wed Feb 10 23:34:33 UTC 2016
I quoted a PCH peering paper at the Peering Track. (Not violating rules, talking about myself.)
The paper is:
I said “99.97%” of all peering sessions have nothing behind them more than a “handshake” or an email. It seems I was in error. Mea Culpa.
The number in the paper, on page one is, 99.52%.
Hopefully everyone will read the paper, and perhaps help create better data.
More information about the NANOG