PCH Peering Paper

Patrick W. Gilmore patrick at ianai.net
Wed Feb 10 23:34:33 UTC 2016

I quoted a PCH peering paper at the Peering Track. (Not violating rules, talking about myself.)

The paper is:

I said “99.97%” of all peering sessions have nothing behind them more than a “handshake” or an email. It seems I was in error. Mea Culpa.

The number in the paper, on page one is, 99.52%.

Hopefully everyone will read the paper, and perhaps help create better data.


More information about the NANOG mailing list