Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
nanog at ics-il.net
Sat Feb 6 21:45:44 UTC 2016
I encourage my competitors to scoff at the secondary market. :-)
Intelligent Computing Solutions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Reynolds" <josh at kyneticwifi.com>
To: "David Bass" <davidbass570 at gmail.com>
Cc: "Cameron Ferdinands" <cameron at jferdinands.com>, nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 3:41:50 PM
Subject: Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
Newer, more expensive, more bugs. 4500 is cheap on the secondary market.
On Feb 6, 2016 3:38 PM, "David Bass" <davidbass570 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, on the list...well the 4600 is since it's somewhat the replacement
> to the 4500/4550.
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Josh Reynolds <josh at kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> Why not consider an EX4500?
> On Feb 6, 2016 12:24 PM, "Cameron Ferdinands" <cameron at jferdinands.com>
>> If you need high-er density 10GE. Consider an Juniper ACX5048.
>> Great edge box, MPLS features, it's essentially just a QFX with
>> repartitioned CAM / some tricks to get the most out of the Trident II
>> Won't do a bunch of things, so make sure it's exactly what you need or
>> you'll burn yourself YMMV.
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM Dan Spataro <dspataro at corp.nac.net> wrote:
>> > Depending on your interpretation of full MPLS stack, you can look into
>> > Brocade CES.
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Bass
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:04 PM
>> > To: nanog at nanog.org
>> > Subject: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
>> > Looking to see what others are using out there as an alternative to a
>> > Cisco ME3600X? Also, what other vendors out there are playing in this
>> > Need a full MPLS stack.
More information about the NANOG