No subject

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at
Fri Dec 2 15:31:32 UTC 2016

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk at> wrote:

> We are busy trying to support a domain name system that is two to
> three orders of magnitude larger (as measured by domains) than it
> should be or needs to be.
that statement seems ... hard to prove.
also, what does it matter the size of the domain system?
also, perhaps this is an incentives problem from the top down? (if it's
really a problem, I mean).

More information about the NANOG mailing list