RFC6598 in AWS?
bill at herrin.us
Fri Aug 5 16:04:04 UTC 2016
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson
<arlingtonalbertson at gmail.com> wrote:
> We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this
> range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced
> using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS?
The Carrier NAT space? The only difference between that and RFC1918
space is that when you have an address conflict with a third party
using 100.64.0.0/10 it is 100% entirely your fault for
Generally speaking, 100.64.0.0/10 should not be assigned to servers,
only client machines. Assigning it to servers creates a probability of
conflict that the space was meant to solve.
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
More information about the NANOG