GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences
frnkblk at iname.com
frnkblk at iname.com
Sat Apr 16 19:48:28 UTC 2016
Note that for E911 purposes we are required to use the MSAG (http://netorange.com/nena-reference/index.php?title=Master_Street_Address_Guide_(MSAG)) to verify street addresses. From what my co-workers at my $DAYJOB tell me, there are many new addresses that are not resolvable.
Despite those shortcomings, E911 calls are responded to and US postal mail is delivered, specifically because a human remains involved in interpreting the information. The same needs to be done with GeoIP results.
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Austin
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:55 AM
To: John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
Cc: niels=nanog at bakker.net; NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:55 AM, John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
> Please don't guess (like, you know, MaxMind does.) USPS has its own
> database of all of the deliverable addresses in the country. They
> have their problems, but give or take data staleness as buildings
> are built or demolished, that's not one of them.
USPS has a database of *most* of the deliverable addresses in the country.
I'm in an unorganized borough. The USPS actually has no mandate, funding or
lever that I can pull (that I can find) to keep their database up to date.
Easily 30% of the legitimate addresses in my area are not geocodable nor in
the USPS database.
I suspect that there are areas of my state with an even worse percentage of
UPS and FedEx rely on the USPS database, but will not lift a finger to fix
Even as a municipal body there is no available federal mechanism for
updating the database. I've tried multiple times over 15+ years.
So yeah, USPS' database does have its problems.
jhaustin at gmail.com
Whitestone Power & Communications
Vertical Broadband, LLC
Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon
More information about the NANOG