Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk

Tue Apr 5 15:25:00 UTC 2016

On 4/4/16 10:29 AM, magicboiz at hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi guys
> 
> thanks  everyone for your replies.
> 
> I'd like to highlight this concept that Christopher gave before:
> 
> "different providers, different entrance facilities in the building(s),
> different conduits out of the area... "
> 
> How can we get this in this world where everyone is moving to big Data
> Center / Colo-Hosters.....In this kind of colo providers, you usually
> have a Meet-Me-Room or similar (which is a single point of failure) and
> no control on how you're actually connected with your peers....

Sometimes you have two or more MMRs sometimes providers are only one one
or another.

The actual discipline here is delivering reliable cost-effective service
with unreliable components...

> Cheers.
> 
> 
> On 04/04/16 15:07, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> nights to fixing the backhaul.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160405/a9267ee1/attachment.sig>