AW: Uptick in spam

Tue Oct 27 22:43:46 UTC 2015

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:59:29 -0400, Peter Beckman said:
> Wouldn't that be interesting -- you can't join NANOG unless your email
> domain publishes an SPF record with a -all rule.
>
> That would raise the bar AND prevent the kind of thing that happened this
> weekend.

And make a number of long-time contributors have to change their e-mail
provider just to participate.

Hint: There's now 4 people listed in the To/From/CC for this mail, of which
2 don't have a -all SPF record published.

Oh. And there's this in the DNS as well:

nanog.org.              600     IN      TXT     "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:50.31.151.74 ip6:2001:1838:2001:8::10 ip4:50.31.151.73 ip6:2001:1838:2001:8::9 ~all"

Did you *really* want to go there?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20151027/ed046fe5/attachment.sig>