"no more spam" isn't emough

Karl Auer kauer at biplane.com.au
Mon Oct 26 21:23:31 UTC 2015


On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 11:29 -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> No coding required, just used Thunderbird's facility.  Eight seconds 
> start to finish.  No more spam.

Filtering at the endpoint is good for reducing the number of times
someone has to click "Delete".

For those of us in regions with inbound data quotas, upstream spam
filtering is essential. Sure, I filtered them all straight to trash, but
only after I'd already paid for them.

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389

GPG fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4
Old fingerprint: EC67 61E2 C2F6 EB55 884B E129 072B 0AF0 72AA 9882





More information about the NANOG mailing list