IPv6 Irony.

Rinse Kloek rinse.kloek at isp.solcon.nl
Tue Oct 20 12:21:41 UTC 2015


I bet most money is spent on hiring software developers to change/review 
all BSS/NSS systems to adopt to IPv6 ;)

Op 13-10-2015 om 13:11 schreef Paul S.:
> Anyone in a network administrator position struggling with IPv6 (and 
> not willing to fix that out of their own initiative) has no business 
> running any network.
>
> You should hire better staff.
>
> On 10/13/2015 06:56 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
>> On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in 
>> hardware.
>>
>> Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...
>>
>> So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6
>> adoption ;)
>>
>> On 13.10.15 06:17, Ca By wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher at f5.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far 
>>>> IPv6
>>>> has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support 
>>>> today
>>>> Ironic.
>>>>
>>>> Oh wait..
>>>>
>>>> Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself.
>>>>
>>>> Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest 
>>>> adopters of
>>>> IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. 
>>>> And
>>>> being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A
>>>> static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
>>>>
>>>> :sigh:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Tech support websites are long tail
>>>
>>> Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in
>>> high traffic use cases.
>>>
>>> Sighing about edge cases in the long tail  with ipv6 ... Not sure 
>>> what you
>>> expect.
>>>
>>> <deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has 
>>> caused me
>>> outtages>
>>>
>>> CB
>>>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list