IP-Echelon Compliance

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Oct 14 16:49:56 UTC 2015

looks like ip-echelon's MX's are: - - - 122-134-3.dsl.connexus.net.au. ?

you could presumably just iptables away (or postfix reject) from
those, and then there's this:

ip-echelon.com.         300     IN      TXT     "v=spf1
include:mailgun.org ~all"
ip-echelon.com.         300     IN      TXT     "v=spf1
include:mail.zendesk.com ?all"
ip-echelon.com.         300     IN      TXT     "v=spf1
ptr:ip-echelon.com ip4: ip4:
ip4: include:_spf.google.com ~all"
ip-echelon.com.         300     IN      TXT     "MS=ms85153493"

joy. messy :(

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:20:39 +0200, Randy Bush said:
>> >> http://www.procmail.org/
>> > I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach.  There is no
>> > obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet
>> > services to them, including SMTP services.
>> computers are cheap.  my time is finite and i value it highly.  what is
>> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time?
> I suppose it would be bad form to suggest hiring somebody from <insert favorite
> crime cartel> with a Louisville Slugger to perform percussive maintenance on
> the offending party?

More information about the NANOG mailing list