How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force rapid ipv6 adoption")

Sven-Haegar Koch haegar at
Fri Oct 2 10:53:02 UTC 2015

On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Mark Andrews wrote:

> > Likewise, sub-allocations can come into play, where a hoster is 
> > delegated a /48, but then subdivides it for various customers.
> A hoster is a LIR.  It isn't the end customer.

I think you are wrong here for a lot of szenarios.

Today we have for example small web-agency gets /25 from datacenter 
hoster (LIR), puts two servers there, couple of VM, and then rents those 
VM to its 50 customers.

>From the datacenter hoster point they would perhaps get one /48...


Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
- Ben F.

More information about the NANOG mailing list