How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
matthew at matthew.at
Fri Oct 2 00:55:19 UTC 2015
On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote:
> I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network.
> IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver.
Isn't that simply a consequence of your engineering decision to use
464xlat instead of native dual-stack, as was originally envisioned for
> And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more
> performant is more profitable
Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering
decision to use 464xlat?
More information about the NANOG