How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

Fri Oct 2 00:55:19 UTC 2015

On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
> I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network.
>
> IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver.

Isn't that simply a consequence of your engineering decision to use 
464xlat instead of native dual-stack, as was originally envisioned for 
the transition?

>
> And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more
> performant is more profitable
>

Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering 
decision to use 464xlat?

Matthew Kaufman