How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
marka at isc.org
Fri Oct 2 00:01:25 UTC 2015
In message <20151001232613.GD123100 at rootmail.cc.le.ac.uk>, Matthew Newton writes:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:42:57PM +0000, Todd Underwood wrote:
> > it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the rest
> > of the internet. it's unfortunate that we made that mistake, but i guess
> > we're stuck with that now (i wish i could say something about lessons
> > learned but i don't think any one of us has learned a lesson yet).
> Would be really interesting to know how you would propose
> squeezing 128 bits of address data into a 32 bit field so that we
> could all continue to use IPv4 with more addresses than it's has
> available to save having to move to this new incompatible format.
Additionally it is now a OLD addressing protocol. We are about to
see young adults that have never lived in a world without IPv6. It
may not have been universally available when they were born but it
was available. There are definitely school leavers that have never
lived in a world where IPv6 did not exist. My daughter will be one
of them next year when she finishes year 12. IPv6 is 7 months older
than she is.
Some of us have been running IPv6 in production for over a decade
now and developing products that support IPv6 even longer.
We have had 17 years to build up a universal IPv6 network. It
should have been done by now.
> Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at le.ac.uk>
> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
> I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
> For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the NANOG