DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Tue Nov 24 21:58:42 UTC 2015


> On Nov 24, 2015, at 13:51 , Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs at xs4all.net> wrote:
> 
> On 24/11/15 22:47, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:27 , Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs at xs4all.net> wrote:
>>> In article <xs4all.85AC9398-125E-4078-86DA-63962DF76662 at delong.com> you write:
>>>> Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of development
>>>> and real running code for complete implementations throughout any
>>>> sort of site hierarchy.
>>> 
>>> Well, it works for us.
>> 
>> What size prefix are you delegating to those end users?
> 
> A /48.
> 
> Mike.

Exactly… This discussion wasn’t about can or can’t IPv6. The topic of hierarchy came up
when someone mentioned getting a /56 from their provider and I pointed out that anyone
receiving a /56 should contact their provider and request a proper /48.

Owen




More information about the NANOG mailing list