bad announcement taxonomy
jared at puck.nether.net
Fri Nov 20 14:05:42 UTC 2015
Did someone say NAT?
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Baker, Byrn <Byrn.Baker at charter.com> wrote:
> Don't get on Kens bad side.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ken Matlock
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 12:44 PM
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: bad announcement taxonomy
> Origin NAT? ;)
>> On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:15 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:21:32 -0600, David Edelman said:
>>> How about Origin Obfuscation
>> Obfuscation implies intent. Most leaks and mis-announcements don't
>> have intent because they're whoopsies.
More information about the NANOG