Low Cost 10G Router

Blake Hudson blake at ispn.net
Wed May 20 16:59:19 UTC 2015

As mentioned by others on the list, a properly configured ASR1004 and up 
can do this.


Colton Conor wrote on 5/20/2015 11:42 AM:
> So, from the sounds of it most are saying for low cost, the way to go would
> be a software router, which I was trying to avoid. To answer the bandwidth
> question, we would have three 10G ports with three different carriers and
> at max push 10Gbps of total traffic to start.
> I think this leaves me with hardware routers that can support full BGP
> tables. So, who actually sells full bgp routers. So far on my list I have:
> Juniper MX Series
> Brocade MLXe or CER
> Cisco ASR 9K
> Huawei NE40E-X1-M4
> ZTE, not sure which model?
> ALU 7750
> Besides the above, am I missing anyone else that makes a true carrier grade
> hardware router?
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello!
>> Yes, we could run route add / route del when we got any announce from
>> external world with ExaBGP directly. I have implemented custom custom
>> Firewall (netmap-ipfw) management tool which implement in similar
>> manner. But I'm working with BGP flow spec. It's so complex, standard
>> BGP is much times simpler.
>> And I could share my ExaBGP configuration and hook scripts.
>> ExaBGP config:
>> https://github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon/blob/master/src/scripts/exabgp_firewall.conf
>> Hook script which put all announces to Redis Queue:
>> https://github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon/blob/master/src/scripts/exabgp_queue_writer.py
>> But full BGP route table is enough big and need external processing.
>> But yes, with some Python code is possible to implement route server
>> with ExaBGP.
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Aled Morris <aledm at qix.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 20 May 2015 at 15:00, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Yes, you could do filtering with Quagga. But Quagga is pretty old tool
>>>> without multiple dynamic features. But with ExaBGP you could do really
>>>> any significant route table transformations with Python in few lines
>>>> of code. But it's definitely add additional point of failure/bug.
>>> Couldn't your back-end scripts running under ExaBGP also manage the FIB,
>>> using standard Unix tools/APIs?
>>> Managing the FIB is basically just "route add" and "route delete" right?
>>> Aled
>> --
>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov

More information about the NANOG mailing list