BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested
Rob Seastrom
rs at seastrom.com
Sun Mar 15 16:15:22 UTC 2015
Charles N Wyble <charles at thefnf.org> writes:
> Use a git repository.
> Make tagged releases.
> This enables far easier distributed editing, translating, mirroring etc. And
A fine idea in theory, but not quite as much traction in reality as bcp38.
Creating a need for a BCP for retrieving BCPs so that you get the
right version rather than typing "git clone" and erroneously referring
to whatever is tagged "-develop" seems like a Bad Plan.
It's also not a really reasonable method for distributing
point-in-time documents once people are done with collaborating on
creating them. Most end consumers will not care about the change
history.
> you can still do whatever release engineering you want.
Sure.
> A wiki is a horrible solution for something like this.
Agree 100%
-r
More information about the NANOG
mailing list