BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested
stenn at ntp.org
Sun Mar 15 21:20:25 UTC 2015
Rob Seastrom writes:
> The wiki/living document approach others have suggested seems like a
> poor one to me, for the same reason that I dislike the current trend
> of "there's no release tarball, major release, point release, or
> regression testing - just git clone the repository" in free software
And I like wikis for some things, here it might work (I haven't looked)
and I still do release tarballs with version numbers and some (we're
actively adding more) regression/unit/functional testing.
> Releng is hard and thankless
> but adds enormous value and
> serves as a forcing function for some level of review, cursory though
> it may be.
I think so too.
Hey everybody, please support Network Time. Spread the word. OK, I said it.
Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
More information about the NANOG