BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested

William Norton wbn at drpeering.net
Sat Mar 14 19:19:09 UTC 2015

> On Mar 13, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> It does, but for BCOP, I do think it would be best if the new document completely obsoleted the previous document and still relevant content was copied into the new document rather than leaving merge as an exercise.

Agreed - Hence the “Current” in the title. Maybe the date of the document will be the key to let people know that they have the most current version.

> Owen

More information about the NANOG mailing list