Unlawful transfers of content and transfers of unlawful content
lowen at pari.edu
Thu Mar 12 21:14:35 UTC 2015
On 03/12/2015 04:58 PM, Donald Kasper wrote:
> More then website blocking I've been wondering what this means for
> spam prevention?
That's a pretty interesting thought, and it is pretty well addressed by
paragraphs 376, 377, and 378. Basically, the FCC found that spam
blocking is a separate add-on information service. It may be that the
consumer now must opt-in to that service after clear disclosure of what
the service entails. The FCC even found that DNS is not an information
service (paragraphs 366-371), and the argument is compelling. This
Commission is not technically illiterate, that's for sure, whether you
agree with the R&O or not.
More information about the NANOG