Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?

Mike Lyon mike.lyon at gmail.com
Sun Jun 21 06:56:49 UTC 2015


Waaay to many variables to answer the question. Each deployment is
different and requires proper engineering and experience...

-Mike


On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design at gmail.com>
wrote:

> A lot.  It's a good point, but not very helpful to those engineers trying
> to design said infrastructure.
> On Jun 20, 2015 11:45 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>
> > > So....ultimately,  what's the answer?  A huge number of low cost,  low
> > > power WAPs?  Eager readers want to know.   :)
> >
> > what was unclear about the following?
> >
> > Randy Bush wrote:
> > > From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
> > > Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network
> > setup?
> > > To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog at nanog.org>
> > > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:33 +0900
> > > ...
> > > having been in the back seat for many deployments over the years with
> > > all sorts of kit, i have seen great and reliable pretty large
> > > deployments of all of the above (well, xirrus only once).  i have seen
> > > embarrassing messes with all of the above.  i have concluded that the
> > > critical component is the engineer.
> >
>



-- 
Mike Lyon
408-621-4826
mike.lyon at gmail.com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon



More information about the NANOG mailing list