Routing Insecurity (Re: BGP in the Washington Post)

Wed Jun 10 01:29:05 UTC 2015

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:19:23 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu said:

> Didn't we have a very amusing afternoon a number of years ago when $VENDOR
> did exactly that with some invalid routing data? Or am I mis-remembering
> history, and therefor doomed to mis-repeat it?

Actually, it was collusion. $VENDOR-A forwarded the bad data all over, and every
$VENDOR-B router that saw it went walkies...

It's the memory that goes first. I can't remember what goes second....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150609/9c854c5e/attachment.sig>