BGP in the Washngton Post

Max Tulyev maxtul at netassist.ua
Mon Jun 1 16:56:28 UTC 2015


Is there *IN THEIORY* any possibility to make BGP secure enough now?

Yes, RPKI protects from fat fingered people, but NOT protects from
people doing hijacks knowlingly.

The global routing registry really can be the solution, but it
automatically gives one authority a power to cut off any network.
Imagine how fast it will be used for censorship.

On 01.06.15 16:24, William Herrin wrote:
> Interesting story about BGP and security in the Washington Post today:
> 
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2015/05/31/net-of-insecurity-part-2/
> 
> -Bill
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list