Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
Nikolay Shopik
shopik at inblock.ru
Tue Jul 14 22:10:04 UTC 2015
Or wait ILNP/ILA https://lwn.net/Articles/647515/
> On 15 июля 2015 г., at 0:09, Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com> wrote:
>
> Exactly.
>
> As a business entity and not a provider, we wouldn't have even contemplated deploying IPv6 without PI addresses. The myth of easy renumbering and/or having multiple prefixes/address per host for failover still shows up from time to time, but mostly gets ignored (at least in the corporate world). Remember SHIM?
>
> Any reasonable size organization that expects reliable internet connections is going to go BGP/PI.
>
>
>
> ----
> Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
> Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
> OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
> aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM
> To: Chuck Church
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
>
>> What about dual-homed customers? Or are they all expected to have their own
>> PI space?
>
> This is IPv6. Why shouldn't they have their own PI space?
>
> R's,
> John
More information about the NANOG
mailing list