Hotels/Airports with IPv6

Fri Jul 10 22:18:10 UTC 2015

> Limited municipal budgets is all I can say. 
> IPv6 has a cost, and if they can put it off 
> till later then that's often good politics.

IPv4 has a cost as well.  May as well just go 
IPv6-only from day one and not pay the IPv4 
tax at all.

The cost difference between providing IPv6 + 
IPv4 or just IPv4 from day 1 should be zero.  
There should be no re-tooling.  You just 
select products that support both initially.  
It's not like products that support both are 
more expensive all other things being equal.
--------------------------------------

You're talking logical sense and from what I 
have seen, government-oriented managers do 
not do that.  It's politics only.  Not 
technical.  Not logical.  Not actual 
save/make money.  Put it off until a later 
date.  Period.

scott

(work [close enough to gov't folks to be painful]
has got me feeling cynical today... :-)