MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Jan 8 15:09:03 UTC 2015
On Friday, January 02, 2015 11:03:21 PM Daniel Rohan wrote:
> Also think physical topologies like ethernet rings.
> Where's the RR go in this topology?
In these topologies, I've been playing with having the RR's
in the core (i.e., on the other end of the PE Aggregation
routers terminating the ring) and running the iBGP sessions
between the Metro-E Access switches and the RR's.
As the RR's are MPLS-free (but the Metro-E Access switches
[particularly Cisco] still assign MPLS labels to each IGP
route), we cobble together a combination of hop-by-hop IP
forwarding + MPLS forwarding fu to get traffic to where it
needs to go without involving the PE Aggregation routers in
the routing toward the Metro-E Access switches (i.e., 0/0
and ::/0 + a few more specifics come from the RR's).
Been working with this routing topology for MPLS rings since
2009. It seems to hold up...
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150108/bf196e46/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list