Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

Michael Hallgren m.hallgren at free.fr
Fri Feb 27 23:08:59 UTC 2015


Le 27/02/2015 23:19, Owen DeLong a écrit :
> Any website which does not violate the law.
>
> In other words, if a lawful takedown order

So, subject to legal control rather than simply administrative. Right?

mh

>  has been applied to a website, this code can’t be used to force an ISP to provide illegal access to said site.
>
> Owen
>
>> On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:14 , Jim Richardson <weaselkeeper at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From 47CFR§8.5b
>> (b) A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet
>> access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block
>> consumers from accessing lawful Web sites, subject to reasonable
>> network management; nor shall such person block applications that
>> compete with the provider's voice or video telephony services, subject
>> to reasonable network management.
>>
>> What's a "lawful" web site?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote:
>>> On 02/27/2015 01:19 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
>>>> We're solving an almost non-existing problem.. by over-empowering an
>>>> already out of control US government, with powers that we can't even begin
>>>> to understand the extend of how they could be abused... to "fix" an industry
>>>> that has done amazingly good things for consumers in recent years.
>>>>
>>> You really should read 47CFR§8.  It won't take you more than an hour or so,
>>> as it's only about 8 pages.
>>>
>>> The procedure for filing a complaint is pretty interesting, and requires the
>>> complainant to do some pretty involved things. (47CFR§8.14 for the complaint
>>> procedure, 47CFR§8.13 for the requirements for the pleading, etc).  Note
>>> that the definitions found in 47CFR§8.11(a) and (b) are pretty specific in
>>> who is actually covered by 'net neutrality.'
>>>




More information about the NANOG mailing list